Dear ScienceDirect,
This is my semi-annual message to you explaining how awful, frustrating and ultimately self-defeating your registration process is.
As I explained in my message from four years ago, having your system automatically generate a user-name for someone as part of your registration process is a complete disaster. No one on the face of the planet is going to remember what your system has assigned to them.
There is no other website -- none -- that forces machine-generated user-names down the throats of its users. Just look around. The only reason I can imagine you have such a system is as a way to guarantee that the least amount of people actually use your service.
But don't believe me, just look at your own stats!
Sincerely,
Leo Klein
Chicago, IL
P.S. Making the machine-generated user-name case-sensitive(!!!) only adds insult to injury.













Full-text:
-----Original Message-----
From: ScienceDirect
[Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2003 11:18 PM
Subject: ScienceDirect Comment
Sent by : Leo Klein
The following refers to creating a profile in ScienceDirect.
Because you automatically assign a user name instead of asking the user to come up with one, the likelihood of forgetting the computer-assigned name is much higher. I use countless services all requiring a user-name through the course of my day and I'll be least likely to remember those which an automated system has chosen for me rather than one I've chosen for myself.
The only thing I routinely remember about the user name when logging into Science Direct is that it's not one of the normal ones I use. What I have to do then is rely on inputing my original email address and retrieving the ScienceDirect username and password indirectly through my email application and only then proceeding to do what I want at the ScienceDirect site. This is not the most efficient way of doing things.
Here's a bet: if you allowed users to create their own user-names, the use of email fall-back solution such as I've described would diminish considerably. Use of profiles might increase as well.
Sincerely,
Leo Robert Klein
Hot off the digital press via email (with permission):
Well, it's good to know that something is in the works but five years seems to be a long time to wait.
In any case, good luck!